자료는 slatedroid.com에서 퍼왔습니다.

http://www.slatedroid.com/topic/21022-tablet-performance-comparison/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quadrant With Some Linpack & Neocore Benchmarks For A8 & A9 CPUs

Quadrant Advanced
http://www.aurorasoftworks.com/

Linpack (FPU bench)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINPACK

Neocore 3D Bench
https://market.andro...x.neocore&hl=en


[1] EV2 - 2 x A9 @ 533 MHz + PowerVR 530
*Great CPU & Linpack scores because of multi-threaded tests, weak to Ok 2D scores, Ok 3D score.

A9N
http://micdigi.com/2...d-on-dual-core/

Linpack: 18.5 Mflops
Quadrant: 1394
CPU: 3890, Memory: 710, I/O: 1918, 2D: 110, 3D: 341

Rena 3
http://4pda.ru/forum...&noform=1&st=20

Linpack: 18.5
Quadrant: 1226
CPU: 3415, Mem: 687, I/O: 1502, 2D: 164, 3D: 386


[2] Amlogic AM8726 - A9 @ 800 MHz or 1 GHz O/C + ARM Mali-400
*Great Linpack & CPU scores, great 2D, weaker I/O and good 3D.

7" Anku?
http://www.androidat...id=58&Itemid=70

Linpack: 21.6 Mflops
Quadrant: ???
CPU: 2655, Mem: 1297, I/O: 489, 2D: 236, 3D: 444

W10
http://www.pcpop.com.../657420_1.shtml

Linpack: 19 Mflops
Quadrant: 997
CPU: 2768, Mem: 1032, I/O: 501, 2D: 238, 3D: 447

Ten SmartQ (aml8726) (1024x768)
http://www.isyo.net/...php?tid-33.html

Quadrant: 2434
CPU: 2142, Mem: 1289, I/O: 8178, 2D: 120, 3D: 442
Neocore: 29.7 FPS

Zenithink C91 (aml8726 @ 1 GHz) (1024x600)
http://b.it168.com/t...714746-1-1.html

Quadrant: 1748
CPU: 2661, Mem: 935, I/O: 4627, 2D: 144, 3D: 373

Ainol NOVO 8 (1280x768)
http://micdigi.com/2...s-of-haipad-m8/
http://bbs.imp3.net/...315006-1-1.html

Quadrant: 2000
CPU: 2667, Mem: 1175, I/O: 5652, 2D: 99, 3D: 407
Neocore: 25.1 FPS


[3] Samsung S5PV210 A8 @ 1 or 1.2 GHz + PowerVR 540
*Very strong 2D & 3D scores, weaker I/O & CPU score though Linpack (FPU) gives good score to Samsung. Quadrant must have ran some CPU tests that the Samsung CPU was not happy about and may not reflect real world performance. S5PC110 should get similar performance with better battery life.

Aishuo A815
http://www.shenit.co...d-tablet-video/

Linpack: 14 Mflops
Quadrant: 955
CPU: 1432, Memory: 1622, I/O: 568, 2D: 266, 3D: 887

HeroTab MID816
Linpack: 15
Quadrant: 1019
CPU: 1520, Memory: 1671, I/O: 750, 2D: 263, 3D: 889

M728/T9 (800x600)
http://dealer.zol.co...et_5215438.html

Linpack: 13.73
Quadrant: 926
CPU: 1371, Mem: 1511, I/O: 621, 2D: 256, 3D: 870
Neocore: 58.1 FPS


[4] Freescale i.MX515 + Adreno 200 (AMD Z430?)
*Weak CPU score, good 2D and weak 3D.

OhPad @ 1 GHz
http://mid.pconline..../2340642_2.html

Quadrant: 1020
CPU: 970, Mem: 947, I/O: 2796, 2D: 180, 3D: 209


[5] Rockchip 2918 + Vivante GC800
*Very good 3D but weaker 2D Quadrant scores in almost all benches below except for the Arnova 10G2 which has good 2D #. This could point to a driver (firmware) issue rather than badly designed 2D GPU? Could affect fast action, higher res display or high detail 2D type games. Also, Linpack (FPU) scores are tad low but Quadrant CPU scores were great. ie, different CPU tests in these benches gave different CPU/FPU scores.

Cube U9GT @ 1.2 GHz
http://www.chinadigi...et-pc-u9gt.html

Quadrant: 1180
CPU: 2314, Mem: 954, I/O: 1938, 2D: 94, 3D: 601

Arnova 10G2
http://www.arctablet...-512-mb-review/

Linpack: 10.9
Quadrant: 1246
CPU: 2341, Mem: 986, I/O: 2119, 2D: 175, 3D: 607
Neocore: 39.3 FPS

Huaye RK2918
http://www.okpbw.com...40-5/5513-2.htm

Linpack: 8.5
Quadrant: 1172
CPU: 2712, Mem: 886, I/O 1723, 2D: 77, 3D: 462
Neocore: 39.9 FPS

UZone F4
http://www.szuzone.c...tail.asp?id=287

Linpack: 10.2
Quadrant: 1350
CPU: 3106, Mem: 970, I/O: 2041, 2D: 71, 3D: 562
Neocore: 36.5 FPS

Uzone F2C
http://www.ereadcn.c...ews-3939-page-4

Linpack: 11
Quadrant: 1303
CPU: 2908, Mem: 992, I/O: 1865, 2D: 129, 3D: 619
NeoCore: 46.5 FPS

Taipower T760 (1024x600)
http://www.gaopad.co...ad-138-1-1.html

Linpack: 9.4
Quadrant: 1286
CPU: 3087, Mem: 895, I/O: 1800, 2D: 97, 3D: 552
Neocore: 35.5 FPS

Wopad i7 (800x480)
Benches done on my tablet

Linpack: 12.9
Quadrant: 1333
CPU: 2921, Mem: 954, I/O: 1971, 2D: 117, 3D: 700
Neocore: 58.0 FPS


[6] TI OMAP A8 1 GHz + PowerVR 530
*Ok 3D but more on weaker side which can be seen in Quadrant 3D & Neocore scores. 2D seems pretty good. Linpack & CPU scores are good. So-so for 3D gaming but should do everything else well. Avoid if you want great 3D performance.

Archos 101 IT (OMAP 3630)
http://www.arctablet...io-100-tablets/

Linpack: 12.8
Quadrant: 1202
CPU: 2639, Mem: 1201, I/O: 1647, 2D: 203, 3D: 319
Neocore: 24.2 FPS


[7] Nvidia Tegra II - 2 x A9 @ 1 GHz
*Notice the really great 2D & 3D scores which only the PowerVR 540 (found in Samsung S5P CPUs) can almost match. This CPU+GPU scores very well in all areas since very powerful hardware.

Toshiba Folio 100 (Tegra 2)
http://www.arctablet...io-100-tablets/

Linpack: 36.09
Quadrant: 2762
CPU: 5858, Mem: 2541, I/O: 4217, 2D: 210, 3D: 986
Neocore: 55.9 FPS


[8] Vimicro VC882 A8 @ 1.3 GHz + Vivante GC400

Haipad M8 (1280x768)
http://micdigi.com/2...s-of-haipad-m8/
*2D score on lower side, 3D score good in Quadrant but pretty low Neocore score tells different story about 3D performance. Only suggest for lighter 2D gaming and to avoid 3D games.

Quadrant: 1477
CPU: 2782, Mem: 1116, I/O: 2952, 2D: 118, 3D: 415
Neocore: 13.6 FPS


NOTES
A] Some CPUs get high Quadrant scores because of I/O which are somewhat important but not that much. Better to look at individual scores rather than the totals when doing comparisons.

The S5PV210 & AM8726 seem to score really low in I/O which brings their total score down. GPU (2D & 3D) is most important to check for the best gaming anyways!

#1 For the Linpack (FPU) scores; the Galaxy Tab (A8 @ 1 GHz) scores 19.5 and Samsung S5PC110 Dev Board @ 1 Ghz scores 13 Mflops for comparison. Quadrant CPU likely measures CPU not FPU performance, ie # of instructions and integer math.

#2 A9N scored higher in CPU but multicore only improves multitasking/OS responsiveness and when using multi-threaded applications. Many games and lots of applications tend to be single threaded. In most cases, 70% or higher. Plus, the somewhat weaker GPU means so-so gaming performance.

#3 For EV2 chip, single threaded programs will only use 1 x A9 @ 533 Mhz which maybe underpowered. Also, high CPU requirement, single threaded applications will use 1 core and may not run really well or at all @ 533 MHz.

#4 The A9N (EV2) uses 3.7v battery and will last longer; almost twice of tablets using 7.4 volts. Almost all China tablets use 7.4v (3.7v + 3.7v in series) and so they only have half the battery capacity. 2 x 3000 mAh @ 7.4v (in series) = 3000 mAh. 2 x 3000 mAh @ 3.7v (in parallel) = 6000 mAh. That also explains why the iPads get 10+ hours of battery time since they run off of 3.7 volts!

#5 The difference in I/O is really crazy. The S5PV210 & AM8726 score very low in this test meaning they will be slower to boot, open, copy and write files but this should be considered a minor negative because their CPUs & GPUs are pretty good performers and should run everything pretty well.

#6 Higher resolutions affect Quadrant 2D & 3D & Neocore scores; give lower gaming performance. If gaming is very important to you then choose a lower resolution tablet. Higher res makes text crisper and better for web browsing & reading.

Conclusion
If you want (1) to ensure all single threaded, high CPU requirement applications run properly and/or (2) are into gaming then avoid buying EV2 tablets like the A9N and Rena3 and go for a higher speed, single core A8 or A9 with PowerVR 540 (S5PV210) or Mali-400 GPU (AM8726).

THIS IS WHY BENCHMARKS ARE IMPORTANT. TO SEE AND CHECK THE PERFORMANCE AND QUALITY OF TABLETS BECAUSE NOT EACH IS EQUAL!!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

요약하면 현재 최고의 능력을 가진 CPU를 장착한 타블렛은

Nvidia Tegra II를 장착한 계열의 타블렛이라고 합니다.

물론 이 결과는 갤탭 10인치가 나오면 바뀌겠죠.

현재 싱글코어중에 최고의 CPU는 Amlogic A9이고 전세대 ARM CPU라는 삼성 Cortex A8의 허밍버드와

Freescale i.MX515가 아직까지 쓸만하다는 것입니다.

단 Amlogic A9의 경우 인터페이스면엔 느릴수 있는 단점을 가지고 있습니다.

NEC가 처음 만든 NEC EV2는 범용성칩으로 모든성능에서 그야말로 무난하게

점수가 나왔습니다.

RK2918의 경우 뭔가 조금 이상한데요.

CPU자체 점수는 굉장히 잘 나오고 3D 능력도 상당히 좋은편이지만 2D에서 괴로울정도로 안좋다고 합니다.

단 Arnova 10G2에서는 그럭저럭 괜찮게 나온걸로 봐서는 기기 제조사의 펌웨어에 따라

성능이 좌우되는 듯합니다.

여기서 아쉬운건 TCC8802자료가 없는데요.

아직까지 고가칩들의 물건들이 나오지 않은 이상

저가칩만 기준으로 이러저래 무난한 작업을 하실려면 NEC EV2를

인터페이스나 3D게임은 약하지만 2D 작업을 주로 하실려면 Amlogic A9 CPU를

3D게임이나 오락적 요소를 즐길려면 RK2918 CPU를 선택하면 좋을것 같습니다.