KPUG에서 많은 사람들이 가지고 있는 Gpad G10의 CPU인 TCC 8902와 앞으로 리뷰할 기기에 들어가는 RK2818 그리고

전에 Zenthink ZT-180이라고 불리면서 10인치에 큰 스크린을 자랑했지만 가격이 저렴한 타블렛에 들어가는 IMAPX200에

비교 분석글입니다.

글이 짤릴지 몰라서 그냥 긁어서 올립니다.

짧게 요약하면 RK2818의 경우 720P까지 지원하지만 MKB의 재생능력이 조금 떨어집니다.

(동영상 부분은 일반적이다라고 보면 됩니다)

물론 3D 기능은 형편없구요.

단 2D쪽과 시스템의 안정성, 그리고 UI의 속도는 셋중에서 가장 뛰어납니다.

TCC89XX쪽은 1080P까지 지원하고 3D도 어느정도 지원을 하고 안정성도 나쁜편이 아니며 3D나 2D쪽도 어느정도 지원을 하며

웹 브라우징 속도도 RK2818과 어느정도 비슷합니다. (말 그대로 범용칩이죠~~)

IMAPX200의 경우 CPU속도가 압도적이며 (1GHz까지 올라가니까~~) 해상도 지원도 빵빵하게 하며 3D에 강점을 가졌지만

인터넷 브라우징의 경우 극악의 로딩속도를 자랑하며 시스템 안정성도 부족한 편이라고 합니다.

Three low-ends dull and stereotyped chip is compared with (RK2818/TCC8900/IMAPX200) horizontally

In the dull and stereotyped scheme of the mainstream at present, Cortex A8/A9 framework is undoubtedly the target who reputable player pays close attention to, but go back to look in 2010 that just passed, the stage of development that China MID market is basically at starting, the products of ARM9, ARM11 framework are lower because of the whole price, accord with the users of masses’ purchasing power level further, what a lot of consumers touched is still the ABC of model of this kind of low-end. The plateform is examined and specially directed against ARM9, ARM11 top management scheme sideways this time.

Article of this page is divided into three big parts, including: Select scheme and parameter introducing and detailed contrasts of characteristic in many aspects of corresponding to the products, selecting the model rejected sideways. The advanced person below enters the first part:

Dull and stereotyped scheme used for commenting sideways and corresponding to the products to choose – -

Though Chinese market every low-end of brand dull and stereotyped quantity numerous, count accurately, stand up ARM9 that adopt, ARM11 punish chip have several very fewer only, not coming abundantly as Cortex A8/A9 camp far, it is a difficult inverted trend to replace the old framework core gradually out of date by the chip of more advancedly instruction set, the foreign chip has been already developed to a lot of manufacturers to ARMv7 A8/A9 has been all Research and development stage,last one step. And China IC designing trader at 2011 year too gradually in A8, set out stage A9, the dull and stereotyped chip of ARM9, ARM11 framework and nothing more than representing the products a little that it can be found at present that:

The intersection of Weisheng and WM8505/WM8505 ARM9, 300MHz/400MHz, 128MB DDR2, 16bit, there is not 3D that accelerate, 65nm –The country is beautiful to fly and touch a generation, mountain fastness VIA plateform
Weisheng WM8650 ARM11, 600MHz, 300MHz DSP, 256MB DDR2, GPU is unknown, 65nm –The end of 2010 is released, there is no relevant products to go on the market temporarily
Samsung S3C6410 ARM11, 667MHz/800MHz, 128MB DDR/256MB mDDR, 65nm –2009 will have already appeared, device Q5/Q7, for representatives already stop production intelligently
Auspicious core little RK2808 ARM9, 600MHz, 550MHz DSP, 128MB SDRAM, 32bit, there is not 3D that accelerate, 65nm –The sound is happy to gather together W7, Tsing Hua Tong Fang Q5
Auspicious core little RK2818 ARM9, 624MHz, 600MHz DSP, 256/512MB DDR2, 32bit, ARM Mali-55 waits to confirm, 65nm –Electric T720, original way N6 of Taiwan, Owen N3
Telechips TCC8900/8902 ARM11, 720MHz, 256MB DDR2, 32bit, ARM Mali-200, 65nm –Device R10, cool than the magic cube U6 intelligently
Full of square little IMAPX200 ARM11, 800MHz/1GHz, 256MB DDR2, 32bit, VIVANTE GC600, 65nm –Jone Sri Lankan ePad, country is beautiful to fly and touch 2 generations

On-chip several above-mentioned style, Weisheng WM8505 is low because of primary frequency, such reasons as the memory is little, the video ability is weak, overall performance is quite bad, have basically already faded out in the major visual field at present, so no longer join the contrast, subsequent WM8650 chip does not have relevant products to go on the market temporarily, are excluded too; Samsung S3C6410 device Q series MID already stops production at present, does not include in the range no longer intelligently. RK2808 is limit to the applied SDRAM memory, and stay in the old system of Android 1.5 as first little plateform top management of auspicious core, also no longer single contrast. Examine, choose, have many RK2818, TCC8900, IMAPX200 3 sections of chips to correspond to product compare at market at present sideways this time, state briefly one by one as follows.

Talk about RK2818 first, this is a main scheme in the little market at present of auspicious core following RK2808, compared the former though primary frequency was not obviously promoted, but the memory staging makes the running speed much more smooth to 256MB DDR2, carry Android 2.1 system at the same time, improve in the compatible respect of the software too. The auspicious core is little should or invest a lot of research and development efforts on this platform, make relevant product of RK2818 operate, react in fundamental interface and the intersection of system stability and display fairly permitted. But it is the highest that its video broadcasts ability although can reach 720P, the support to MKV is not good, at the same time 3D in ability for their to ribs soft,there are problem that it condemn too on this point. Because own completeness great of RK2818 scheme that the auspicious core offers a little, has in addition, been cooperating with it all the time closely in many terminal stations manufacturers, the products of this scheme are being put out, mostly adopt resistance of 7 inches screen on the Chinese market constantly, the model that some matching electric capacity rejects appears too now, and the manufacturer turns over the memory time, make every effort to have new promotion in speed, but this obviously tackles a problem on the surface, not at the root.

And then see Telechips TCC890X chip of the lower ARM11 framework, TCC8901 of this series is applied to the whole high definition MP4 extensively as far back as 2009, and device use TCC8902 type, produce several the intersection of MID and model early too, support system including Android, Ubuntu, WinCE intelligently, but unpopular, until will it be dull and stereotyped when in great outburst 2010 the second half year, TCC8902 chip really adopted extensively. The advantage of its maximum should be to support 1080P of many forms to be smooth and hard and is decoded, but should be because of lacking trader’s sufficient support of the chip, not very very good all the time in system optimization, the whole running speed does not dare to flatter. 3D characteristic should be stronger than RK2818 in terms of the hardware, but drive and improve degree discrepancily, it is general to behave actually. In term of present market current situation, a lot of small manufacturers rather favored this chip, the relevant products are innumerable too. Note: According to materials consulted, the difference between TCC8900 and TCC8902 lies in it is different that the integrated interface enriches the intensity, the characteristic is basically concerted

The intersection of ultimate analysis and lower the intersection of IMAPX200 and the scheme, it full of square little reputations to be though big, the frequency can fry chip to move to 1GHz burning hot at one time. It can support 1080P hard to solve in video, the intersection of itself and 3D accelerator that can fairly have too. But not enough to optimization degree of the system, do not have big brand that put out the corresponding products now, the present model is basically that the not high mountain fastness of quality is produced for the factory, there is more BUG on the hardware, the whole power consumption is very great too.

In sum, compare with and assess and test and choose Owen N3, device R10 intelligently and Jone Sri Lankan ePad these three products horizontally this time, though say it may not be loud enough from name, this is exactly epitome that China leans towards the dull and stereotyped market of low-end, what there is no big international brand sets foot in, the majority is the products of the small manufacturer of native country, do not lack the white brand model of mountain fastness even more. Certainly, the brand is not the most important factor, the characteristic determines to use and experience. Even if these schemes are not given strength the exposing successively of Cortex A8 top management, but little, there should be greater change within annual back several months while packed with ARM9/11 current situation for the strength products ing on the market of low-end.

To see three product basic parameters of downing and participating in and comparing with horizontally – -

1,Owen N3 Little RK2818 top management scheme of auspicious core

More than 7.0 inches of electric capacity screen, 800* 480 picture element of definition
Operate Android 2.1 operating system
Memory 256MB, the self-carrying 8GB flashing memory is used for preserving the user file
Fuselage size 192mm * 118mm * 11.9mm, heavy 370g
Built-in 4500mAh lithium polymer battery, voltage 3.7V
Retail price: 1699 yuan

2,Device R10 Telechips TCC8900 top management scheme intelligently

9.7 inches of IPS faceplates, 1024* 768 picture element, resistance type operation
Operate Android 2.1 operating system
Memory 256MB, the self-carrying 2GB flashing memory is used for preserving the user file
Fuselage size 255mm * 192mm * 14mm, heavy 770g
Built-in 7500mAh lithium polymer battery, voltage 3.7V
Retail price: 1499 yuan

3,Jone Sri Lankan ePad Full of the square little IMAPX200 scheme

10.1 inches of liquid crystal screens, 1024* 600 picture element, resistance type operation
Operate Android 2.1 operating system
Memory 256MB, the self-carrying 2G flashing memory is used for preserving the user file
Fuselage size 270mm * 180mm * 15mm, heavy 680g
Built-in 2500mAh lithium polymer battery, voltage 7.4V
Retail price: About 900 yuan

Appear a bit more ocular with chart form – -

According to data above, the memory of three is of the same size, systems running are all Android 2.1 editions too, but it is the highest that primary frequency belongs to Sri Lankan of Jone, and the disposition difference of the screen is greater.

Now enter concrete characteristic PK links – -

First, hardware characteristic are compared with and tests

The influence in factors such as system customizing, Java Virtual Machine,etc., compare with the test result part only for reference as follows, do not make the basis of the true characteristic PK. Before the hardware test, Owen N3 and device R10 intelligently are all firmware of the first edition official side has not offered the staging temporarily ,Jone Sri Lankan ePad has been already staging to the newest firmware of 1204 official side.

The testing tools of seven hardwares can not all run on the products of scheme of this top management, so the test result obtained looks a bit incomplete. Carry on the simple explanation to each project.

1. used for testing the top management chip for floating point arithmetic capability in Linpack,there are to last gausses of elimination method solving N systems of linear algebraic equations dense onces unary on test philosophy of it, thus appraise the floating point characteristic of the top management chip. This test result is influenced by Java Virtual Machine efficiency, so consult only as one.

The test results of RK2818 and TCC8900 are similar, IMAPX200 is obviously more than one time higher.

2. simple for ocular testing software,pass operation 10 algorithmic routine it, CPU appears in test ‘ Integer , FPU floating point And the characteristic of the memory, free of Java Virtual Machine efficiency, so the test result presses close to and behaves the true characteristic of the top management chip even more, there is certain reference value.

Three test results of Nbench are all and then increased progressively from RK2818 to TCC8900 gradually to IMAPX200.

3. J Bench Mark is in having been test by top management chip for loads direct of storage spaces built-in and read under buffering by situationing, will be influenced by independent USB control device, so this test result is only for reference.

The result reflected in this test is not accurate, the actual reading speeds of RK2818 and TCC8900 are about 10MB, the intersection of and the former of load fewer than 4MB, the latter can reach 7MB the above-mentioned, this is U6 test result that TCC8900 compares with coolness of serial schemes . Jone Sri Lankan ePad full of the square little scheme has not opened USB to read directly too, has added the built-in only 2GB storage space, it is not too important to read and write the speed, but depend on the speed of media reader that you adopt. By the way say the filing system respect, three models can only support FAT or FAT32 form, though TCC8900 and IMAPX200 possess the whole high definition film and broadcast ability, wants to watch that it is different to realize to exceed 4GB size video file through the products.

4. Neocore is a figure characteristic basic reference testing software based on OpenGL ES 1.1, can find out 2D/3D comprehensive handling capacity of the chip from this test result, the test result is represented with a lot of frames per second.

The products of TCC8900 do not support this testing software, it is seen but experience from in-service use, it is low that the frame rate may not be more square than to full of and little, how high result of natural 10.3fps is not, 3D picture looks at such a speed that there is obvious frame dropping too. RK2818 fewer than 2 behavior of frame, shown and has not offered as a gift the intersection of figure and soft rib of ability its.

5. as its name suggests in GPU Bench for figure processor benchmark test,there are for absolute value on one test results, one is relation size, score in other words, the simple score of seeing a certain chip is nonsensical, will not find out unless see comparing with which one is a little stronger. This software is unable to run on the above-mentioned three platforms.

6. Benchmark is it is synthetic one pieces characteristic testing software,it can last figure characteristic, CPU characteristic, memory characteristic and file system performance,etc., the test result is influenced by jit compiler, so can only be for reference.

The simplicity is according to this software, the figure ability of the three is similar, this, obviously with the real discrepancy. CPU handling capacity, IMAPX200 mark is obviously one or two times higher, this should benefit from its more high master frequency. Memory characteristic and filing system, the whole difference is not big, the TCC8900 one should be a little higher.

7. too in Quadrant for one section all-round property testing software,there are getting more overall very on result that be tested, and more authoritative. It can test CPU, memory, Input/Output, 2D, 3D and comprehensive result, and can carry on the contrast of scoring with the platform scheme of the mainstream at present on the market.

The products of RK2818 are all unable to operate this sincere software, so only compare other two schemes, the result is as follows:

Score synthetically: Telechips TCC8900> is full of square little IMAPX200
CPU scores: Telechips TCC8900<is full of square little IMAPX200
The memory scores: Telechips TCC8900> is full of square little IMAPX200
Input/Output: Telechips TCC8900> is full of square little IMAPX200
2D scores: Telechips TCC8900<is full of square little IMAPX200
3D scores: Telechips TCC8900> is full of square little IMAPX200

Two chips as ARM11 framework, the whole score of TCC8900 should be a little higher, and CPU ability of IMAPX200 is even better.

In general, the result of the chip has basically reflected the handling capacity of various fields, but run and divide and is only for reference. Actual motion result and software compatible ability easy to reflect in order to operate smooth degree as the example in data, though most test results of RK2818 do not behave so well as TCC8900, to operate the obvious feeling is more smooth than the latter.

Second, video decoding are compared with and tests

RK2818 adopt independent the intersection of DSP and video decoding, nominal to can support to 720P while being highest; TCC8900 hard for CPU solves the video, can support 1080P the whole high definition to broadcast; IMAPX200 decodes for the hardware too, the highest can reach the level of 1080P too. By the look of parameter only, RK2818 should be obviously in leeward. Display and to see the concrete test result actually.

In view of TCC8900 being hard to solve ability to be high in itself in scheme and IMAPX200, basically need to broadcast most videos through third party’s player, so two product of scheme these test decoding capability using player of the self-carrying directly, I have not found one yet appropriate and softly to solve the player of the video under RK2818 platform, RockPlayer is unable to turn on the video, VPlayer does not support Android 2.1 system, so test using decoding that the player of the self-carrying carry on too.

In case of that individual feels, MID scheme of the auspicious core little series RK28 emerges from the womb of their Er early MP4 schemes in audio-visual function, been staying in the level of the highest 720P all the time, the incorporating of but Android has not offered as a gift and tied down decoding capability, first it is auspicious to regard as core high definition MP4 the H.264s of selling points little decode,it behave in planes dull and stereotyped of RK2818 in a complete mess too, only these two forms of AVI, RMVB are also to 720P by better support. TCC8900 has the same origin with Telechips previous complete high definition MP4 scheme too, but its decoding capability has not been offered as a gift and is well extended, there is no obvious decline. The decoding capability which is full of square little IMAPX200 is more pleasant, basically keep the same with TCC scheme level, specific slightly a little worse. The intersection of whole and speech, the two roughly the same, fail on numerous top management scheme of Cotrex A8/A9 never, but RK2818 is far got rid of behind.

Recognition and subtitle supporting respect of many audio tracks, the self-carrying players of three products do not support the audio track to switch over, the built-in and all kinds of strap-on subtitle can’t be loaded either, this is a common fault some manufacturers can be supported after optimizing on Android products at present, such as loving visual ARCHOS 70 . Regarding these three platforms, have not found yet the model with these functions appears at present, there is relevant required that is can only be that the installation third party’s player is realized, RockPlayer can be chosen many audio tracks, and mVideoplaer can support the polytype subtitle file.

Third, speed of turning on/off device are compared with and tests

The mobile equipment turning on/off device which adopts the intelligence system will not often be finished in a moment, it would obviously influence mood very much if it is too slow. But regarding platform, the enough average level to represent all products either of speed of turning on/off device on a certain product only, can only consult as one. Correspondent dull and stereotyped systems of these three chips are all Android 2.1, the turning on/off device speed tests and carries on in case of not installing a lot of software. Test it from pushing the starting up key to this section of time intervals totally loading the systematic Main Interface, shut-down tests from clicking the communication frame that downs and confirms shut downing to the black time interval that rejects of screen.

The products in the little RK2818 platform of auspicious core are started fastest, the varied products used before this are almost such a level too. Products of TCC8900 want a lot of slowly, shut-down speed most quick, shut-down of other two speed difference strong.

Fourth, whole scheme power consumption is compared with and tests

Respects such as battery magnitude of different models, circuit design,etc. have a difference, break away from the concrete products and discuss the power consumption is obviously unrealistic. From experiencing and feeling that says, generally it is shorter than the time that the video broadcast to hold the continuation of the journey that WiFi surfs the Net actually, open consumption behind the WiFi besides CPU this one, the intersection of itself and wireless power consumption of chip, it is a power consumptive rich and influential family to look like the Realtek net card that Jone Sri Lankan ePad adopts even more. This power consumption compares with and lays particular emphasis on the comparison to the top management scheme even more, so with the flight duration of video in order to consult. Three machines adopt the player of the self-carrying to broadcast the same video file AVC code in a circle, 704* 432 definition ,Test, in unison for identical the intersection of arrangement and parameter sound volume / in a poor light to adjust for being half the, close WiFi, use the earphone to play .

The average power consumption index is to adopt the total amount of the battery and video flight duration to deduct the result made, the less the figure is, the lower the power consumption of representation unit is.

The factor influencing power consumption is numerous, three sections of screen magnitude of testing the products are different from definition capital, the consumption of large screen should be obviously higher than the small dimension products, in addition if the homogeneous scheme adopted different power management chips, should have difference too continue a journey. Wouldn’t consider other factors, only so far as form, the products of RK2818 undoubtedly have the relatively lowest power consumption, the really continuing a journey incredibly long of N3, in the varied and scheme products that I have used, calculate the very strong one too in Owen N3′s continuation of the journey ability, so the continuation of the journey ability of this link N3 can’t totally represent the major level of this platform either. Jone Sri Lankan flight duration of ePad most short, until back over its generate heat intensity can feel it consumption large too use. Device R10 is the continuation of the journey that can fairly gain with high-capacity battery intelligently.

Fifth, speed of response of the menu and stability contrast

The speed of response of the menu is involved in many kinds of factors, besides treatment characteristic of one’s own top management, the assembly of the touch-sensitive screen and optimization of the system of manufacturer influence really border is operated and experienced. Stability is influenced by improving of the system firmware more, certainly relate with circuit design too. This has more subjectivity, none of objective measurement standards to compare with, the following is the correlation data a representative is relatively best obtained on the basis that my use feel, 2 takes second place, 3 rows of end ,Subjective contrast, are only for reference.

Because of using the products of varied RK2818, run to experience more extensive cognition to it wholly, the plateform of TCC8900 has contacted several too, running speed should be obviously inferior to RK2818, the sequencing of these two does not basically need to consider too much that can be obtained. And the model of IMAPX200 has Sri Lankan ePad this one of Jone only at hand, running speed and stability of touching 2 generations should be a little more outstanding that it is reported to fly, but examine sideways this time since select ePad, is based on it first.

Three machines are Android 2.1 systems, and possess the memory capacity of 256MB too, but because of the difference that is taken up systematically, reality can spend the memory RK2818 respectively ‘ About 200MB >IMAPX200 about 185MB >TCC8900 about 155MB ,And the surplus memory of runtime regards RK2818 as maximum. Though there is not direct relation in memory magnitude and running speed, if the surplus memory will obviously influence the smoothness operated to pass littly. As for the intersection of stability and, though RK2818 to rank the first, can’t say it stability right away getting OK too, crash in fact, flower reject occur repeatedly at the intersection of N3 and the products too, just comparatively speaking. The system halted situation of the device R10 is a bit more frequent intelligently, but Jone Sri Lankan ePad is not complete enough because of the system, the frequency that the procedure collapses is larger while using.

Sixth, browse through the speed contrast of the webpage

Three machines do not support the webpage Flash to reveal, tests the speed of opening iMP3 homepage using browser of the self-carrying separately, and the one that looked over and pulled is smooth.

RK2818 and two products of TCC8900 load the webpage speed similarly, it takes about 20 seconds to open the homepage, the latter is slightly a little faster. Jone Sri Lankan ePad of IMAPX200 has nearly had another time time consumingly. Pulling the smooth respect, Owen N3 supporting the multi-point to touch preferably behaves, but not smooth enough while zooming, device R10 slip, compare Carlos when being met the long page intelligently, the Carlos when Jone Sri Lankan ePad pulls often, there is feeling of a kind of frame dropping, the result is not smooth enough, are stated to fly and have many improvements to touch 2 generations separately, because has not seen the real machine, not easy to make more conclusions. Now choose two browser characteristic testing softwares to compare with the efficiency of these three products, the result is only for reference:

Acid3 mainly investigates to the canonial implementation of the webpage, especially DOM and JavaScript, it is perfect to lay particular emphasis on, the higher the preceding figure is, the better the preceding figure is, iPad result is 100/100, Owen N3′s result is 91/100, device R10 and results in Jone Sri Lankan ePad are all 93/100 intelligently.

Google V8 benchamark suite is used for testing JavaScript characteristic of the browser, optimizes for Chrome browser specially. Can reflect the browser characteristic of this apparatus to a certain extent, score well the better, iPad result is 82, Owen N3′s result is 37.8, the device R10 runtime has been blocked in 89% all the time aplanetically intelligently, the result of Jone Sri Lankan ePad is 48.7.

Seventh, game characteristic contrast

The game characteristic lays particular emphasis on the contrast of 3D figure ability, can be found out from result of Neocore at the time of the initial hardware test, RK2818 it fewer than 2 result of frames to be obviously unable with run, divide, up to, contend by 10 IMAPX200 of frame, and TCC8900 because unable to run software this, how much unknown frame can be run, but according to experience definite and eager to excel in whatever one does to produce much than that of RK2818. Consider on the basis of the hardware respect, has not announced GPU specification adopted in the technical parameter of RK2818, the player claims it plays up 3D picture through ARM core, so will cause very slowly; 3D of TCC8900 accelerates some as ARM Mali-200, one’s own hardware is good, but seem that it is not complete enough to drive; It is VIVANTE GC600 to be full of little 3D squarely and accelerate, and TCC8900 support OPENGL ES2.0/1.1, OPENVG both, it compares focal points with to be still two house PK of chip these this time.

I choose varied game go on, test to three machine these, break out loudly such as Sparta, dungeon hunter a lot now certainly Return run, has only brought a minor city raceabout 5 to see the result. Hot game under the Android at present, lay particular emphasis on, can examine the intersection of gravity and reaction, the intersection of 3D and characteristic even more certainly, the game that the picture such as chess, poker is very simple has tested that has few meanings too.

Jone Sri Lankan ePad existing problem to have a surplus of square little IMAPX200 chips is that the gravity reaction is invalid, not because direction work, but itself which direction can move, in 3D characteristic can it finds out to be fairly strong one under these style; TCC8900 the intersection of device and R10 and behavior of it close comparatively while being overall intelligently, turn on the varied games and appear the phenomenon of crashing, more troubling; 3D characteristic of the auspicious core little RK2818 is undoubtedly the worst, this does not basically need to explain too much either.

Written at the end

When major Android intellectual mobile phones all generally employ the situation of Cortex A8 processor, Android plateform with large screen has proposed more high requirement to the hardware disposition too, and ARM9 and ARM11 have already lagged behind from the framework, while player’s requirement is higher and higher, the nuclear products begin to assault the market of low-end too in batch white brand A8, the low price advantage of ARM9/11 kernel products is lost gradually too, and as to these three products that this selected works select, Owen N3 and the devices R10 can not be all counted as the absolute low price intelligently, though similar many products it drops six seven to to be hundred yuan even low already, characteristic remain very much difficult to attract the reputable player while being low, we can say it is more and more unstable that this kind of products are based on the foundation the market.

RK2818, TCC8900, the intersection of IMAPX200 and three chip these come comparative synthetically, which obviously strong style does it have, because the three all have a prominent shortcoming. The advantage of RK2818 lies in being relatively stable and smooth, but 3D characteristic is too bad, the video ability is more general; The advantage of TCC8900 lies in video decoding, but 3D characteristic is not complete enough either, speed and stability are still more not to dare to flatter; Have IMAPX200 at present it is large adopt brand,mountain fastness model where the manufacturers produce no matter mould, work and stability is getting good more enough.

Certainly, these manufacturers which research and develop ARM9/ARM11 mobile platform have not awaited one’s doom either, can see since CES exhibition they are growing with each passing hour constantly too. At present, the auspicious core is little to release the nuclear RK29XX new platform in Cortex A8, nominal primary frequency achievable 1.2GHz, there will be very great leap by the look of hardware parameter. And Telechips brand-new TCC8903 is based on A8 kernel, it looks that overall performance will be promoted notably, it is believed that these products are relatively worth expecting. However, the relevant products are very difficult to really put out the market before annual spring, we will continue waiting patiently.

Also need to prove about this assessment and test, because mainly experience the respect to compare with from employing, among them unavoidably mix subjective factor, there is style of writing in wrong, welcome to make a comment. In addition read application respect to the e-book that some players cared about, this have something to do with hardware platform, but different one reads the software and behaves not the same, it is difficult to carry on the comparison objectively, so has not joined this partial content while examining sideways.